Landmarks Approves Expansion Of Former Mansion at 105 8th Avenue, Park Slope

Proposed condition at 105 8th Avenue.Proposed condition at 105 8th Avenue.

After a little over a month and a few tweaks, the expansion of a former mansion in Brooklyn got the go-ahead from the Landmarks Preservation Commission on Tuesday. The property in question is 105 8th Avenue, between President Street and Carroll Street in the Park Slope Historic District.

The former single-family home dates back to 1912 and the expansion will allow for it to hold eight residential units. Manhattan-based architect Scott Henson is responsible for the expansion design.

Proposals for 105 8th Avenue, January 5 on the left and February 9 on the right.

Proposals for 105 8th Avenue, January 5 on the left and February 9 on the right.

When the proposal was presented in early January, the commissioners were instantly taken aback by the size of the proposed rear and rooftop additions, which left no trace of the building’s current shape. The revised proposal still includes a one-story rooftop addition and rear extensions, but instead of forming a big box, the additions have offsets so none of them extend all the way to the current rear of the building. That articulation gives at least a hint of the structure’s current massing. Along with that change comes a reconfiguration of the rear balconies, including the addition of a balcony on the new fourth floor.

Rendering showing the stained glass windows repurposed on the interior at 105 8th Avenue.

Rendering showing the stained glass windows repurposed on the interior at 105 8th Avenue.

Another issue was the stained glass windows, of which there are four. Two of them will be relocated to the penthouse, instead of the cellar level. The other two will be entombed with one of them being repurposed as a door.

January proposal for 105 8th Avenue. Note the chimneys.

January proposal for 105 8th Avenue. Note the chimneys.

Another sticking point for many was the proposed new chimney on the left side of the structure. It would have been an issue not only for its aesthetics (or lack thereof), but because of the chimney at the neighboring building. There are code issues when it comes to proximity of chimneys. So, a new chimney extension was devised and the chimney on the right side was also eliminated.

The plan also includes an restoration of the structure, removal of the flagpole from the front façade, and installation of a new intercom.

Commissioner Michael Goldblum called the revised proposal “much improved” and the commissioners voted to approve it. The applicant will, however, work with LPC staff to see if even further reductions of visibility can be accomplished.

See the full presentation slides below:

1058thAvenue_20160209_01 1058thAvenue_20160209_02 1058thAvenue_20160209_03 1058thAvenue_20160209_04 1058thAvenue_20160209_05 1058thAvenue_20160209_06 1058thAvenue_20160209_07 1058thAvenue_20160209_08 1058thAvenue_20160209_09 1058thAvenue_20160209_10 1058thAvenue_20160209_11 1058thAvenue_20160209_12 1058thAvenue_20160209_13 1058thAvenue_20160209_14 1058thAvenue_20160209_15 1058thAvenue_20160209_16 1058thAvenue_20160209_17 1058thAvenue_20160209_18 1058thAvenue_20160209_19 1058thAvenue_20160209_20 1058thAvenue_20160209_21 1058thAvenue_20160209_22 1058thAvenue_20160209_23 1058thAvenue_20160209_24 1058thAvenue_20160209_25 1058thAvenue_20160209_26 1058thAvenue_20160209_27 1058thAvenue_20160209_28 1058thAvenue_20160209_29 1058thAvenue_20160209_30 1058thAvenue_20160209_31 1058thAvenue_20160209_32 1058thAvenue_20160209_33 1058thAvenue_20160209_34 1058thAvenue_20160209_35

Subscribe to YIMBY’s daily e-mail

Follow YIMBYgram for real-time photo updates
Like YIMBY on Facebook
Follow YIMBY’s Twitter for the latest in YIMBYnews

.

2 Comments on "Landmarks Approves Expansion Of Former Mansion at 105 8th Avenue, Park Slope"

  1. Wonder how much of the existing interiors will be lost? Those floor plans appear tortured squeezing in 8 units one has to add numerous partitions and chop up the grand spaces and they obviously have checked off that box.?

  2. Park Slope Resident | February 16, 2016 at 7:36 pm |

    The approved proposal was not “much improved” but rather hardly improved. LPC is run by a political appointee with the goal of approving EVERYTHING that crosses her desk. The percentage of approved applications hovers near 100%, often with minor to no changes. Makes one wonder: What purpose exactly does the Landmarks Commission serve? I also love the near unanimity in every vote; those commissioners are very quick to fall inline when the chair barks. The whole process is cloaked in some sort of “artistic discretion” even though what they approved is basically an architectural abomination.

    This is the SECOND MOST IMPORTANT historic building in the PS historic district). CB6 failed it as it did not force the developer to notify the immediate neighborhood. Park Slope Council failed it as it did not do much to stop it.

Comments are closed.